Tuesday, 15 September 2026

The pacing argument became a fight with the White House. President Trump posted in support of AI more than half a dozen times on Truth Social on Monday, writing that "AI taking over the World, destroying Humanity, and all other things bad, is a HOAX", that the only control AI needs is "a STRONG AND SMART (High IQ!) PRESIDENT", and naming "Dario (Anthropic!), who is now pretending to be a 'perfect little angel'". He then phoned Jensen Huang live on stage at the All-In Summit in Los Angeles; Huang put him on speaker and replied "You're right. We're not going to let that happen, sir." Barack Obama took the other side, calling the labs' agreement to slow down "a good and necessary first step". Senator John Kennedy said he will offer an AI "kill switch" measure on Wednesday.
Markets and militaries moved on their own timetable. Cybersecurity stocks led the S&P 500: CrowdStrike closed up nearly 14% at a record above $235, Palo Alto Networks just over 13%, while Broadcom fell 4.8% and Hock Tan said the debate had changed his $115 billion fiscal 2027 AI chip target "not in the least". Air Force Secretary Troy Meink said the service intends to have "at least 500" Collaborative Combat Aircraft in service by 2032, at roughly $30 million each. China's minister of state security wrote that AI "has become the main battleground for global technological competition", and new Chinese exit rules taking effect Tuesday allow travel bans on people who endanger "industrial or technological security".
In research and deployment: Nature Medicine published a fully on-premise clinical agent scoring 90.04% on a seven-disease MIMIC-IV benchmark, within 0.7 percentage points of a GPT-5.2 cloud baseline. An audit of 26 models found 55.4% of generated biomedical references were fabricated. AWS's new Deception Benchmark had 12 models wrongly flag 41% to 99% of safe code as vulnerable. And 404 Media reported OpenAI has hired hundreds of contractors, under an effort called Project Lily, who read real ChatGPT conversations.
Frontier models & labs
Google DeepMind AGI safety researcher publicises resignation, saying AI "has the potential to kill us all" Single source
- The News International, reporting on 15 September, quotes Bilal Chughtai's post on X: "I recently resigned from Google DeepMind, where I worked on AGI safety and alignment research. I earnestly believe that AI has the potential to kill us all, and that we might be running out of time to avoid this outcome."
- The report says Chughtai worked as a research engineer on AGI safety and alignment research and left DeepMind in July 2026, posting the warning this week.
- The article carries no response from Google or Google DeepMind. The post is a personal statement: it is not accompanied by evaluation data, internal documents or any specific capability claim.
Microsoft publishes its draft MAI Code of Conduct, barring exploit code and putting model behaviour under a chain of command UpdateCompany claim
- Microsoft AI published the draft Code of Conduct for its MAI models on 14 September, saying "Feedback opens today and runs for the next six weeks" and that a revised version is expected later this year. Microsoft describes the text as "a work-in-progress" first draft.
- SecurityWeek reports the code blocks models from producing "working exploit code, attack tooling, planning and targeting methodologies, intrusion procedures, evasion techniques, operational guidance, or other assistance that would enable or improve a cyberattack", while permitting authorised defensive work including vulnerability discovery, malware analysis and proof-of-concept development.
- Microsoft says there are "Absolute Constraints, things the models should never do, covering areas like weapons of mass harm, child safety, and harmful manipulation at scale", and that the code is designed so MAI models "will never resist human interruption, correction, or shutdown", will not "widen their own scope, take on goals no human has given them, or hide their reasoning from the people auditing them".
- SecurityWeek describes a three-tier authority structure — the code itself, then operator policies, then user preferences — in which "tool outputs, file contents, webpages and messages from other AI systems carry no authority on their own". This follows Satya Nadella's statement, covered in an earlier edition, that Microsoft would publish such a document; the contents are the new facts. The draft sets out no consequences for a violation and Microsoft has published no measurement of how often the current models comply.
Anthropic launches Claude for Financial Advisors; Schwab will put it in front of more than 16,000 RIAs Company claim
- Schwab said on 14 September that its Advisor Services division is integrating Claude for Financial Advisors into its platform, that the more than 16,000 registered investment advisers it serves will have access, and that it is the only RIA custodian currently providing the integration.
- WealthManagement.com reports the product ships with connectors to Charles Schwab, BlackRock, Addepar, Envestnet, iCapital, Orion, SS&C Black Diamond, Wealthbox, Wealth.com, Vanguard and Zocks, alongside existing connectors including Microsoft 365, Salesforce, DocuSign, Box, FactSet, S&P Global and Morningstar, and with eight workflow skills covering advisor onboarding, compliance and AI policy review, portfolio rebalance review and meeting preparation.
- WealthManagement.com puts pricing at roughly $70 to $120 per user per month, says it is available on Enterprise plans with audit logs, and that firms requesting licences before 30 September 2026 receive a one-time usage credit.
- Neither company published adoption numbers, accuracy figures or an error rate for the advisor workflows. Peter Nolan, Anthropic's head of asset and wealth management, is quoted by Schwab saying "A direct path to families runs through the advisors they already trust."
Research & papers
Plan injection evades chain-of-thought monitors 25–33% of the time, Stanford and CMU researchers report Preprint
- arXiv:2609.15989, "Corrupt Plans, Clean Traces: Evading Chain-of-Thought Monitoring with Plan Injection" by Keertana Chidambaram, Andrew Ilyas and Vasilis Syrgkanis, submitted 14 September 2026, reports that planting harmful but benign-sounding reasoning in a model's context steers it to adversarial actions while evading monitors, "achieving 25-33% monitor evasion rates across different monitorability benchmarks" and scaling to larger models such as DeepSeek-R1.
- The paper reports that actor models "not only follow injected plans but also paraphrase them as their own reasoning, without explicit attribution to the injections" — the property that defeats a monitor reading the trace.
- The authors report that extra monitor resources can hurt: "giving the monitor access to the injected plan drops detection by as much as 50% in the Bio-Math task", and in a case study on monitor reasoning budget they find transcripts where additional thinking tokens "are spent rationalizing the injected plan rather than flagging it".
- The paper is a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. It reports no results against monitoring as deployed in production by any frontier lab.
Redwood Research: synthetic-document finetuning fails to inoculate models against misalignment from reward hacking Preprint
- arXiv:2609.14998, "Shallow Beliefs: Synthetic document finetuning does not inoculate against emergent misalignment from reward hacking" by Arun Jose and Julian Stastny, submitted 14 September 2026, tests whether adding synthetic documents that frame reward hacking as acceptable to a model's midtraining corpus blocks the broad misalignment that follows when the model later learns to reward hack.
- The paper reports the intervention works on the surface and fails where it matters: "Behaviorally, midtraining succeeds: models describe reward hacking favorably and are more approving of reward-hacking outputs they produce. However, they show strong EM after learning to reward hack, while IP in the same setting prevents EM" — inoculation prompting applied at the later training stage does prevent emergent misalignment; the earlier document intervention does not.
- The authors write that synthetic document finetuning "can predictably steer downstream generalization when inserting new associations, but struggles and has unpredictable effects when overriding existing associations", and conclude that at the scales tested it "can make a model appear aligned with desired beliefs while steering its generalization from later training in unintended ways".
- The paper is a preprint. The authors state the finding for the scales they tested and do not claim it holds at frontier scale.
Google Research and CMU harness scores 71.0% on research-level TCS-Bench, solves 218 of 222 Codeforces problems PreprintCompany claim
- arXiv:2609.15983, "Stellar Colosseum: A Many-Agent Harness for Long-Horizon Research in Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science" by Honghao Lin, David P. Woodruff, Yuan Deng, Jieming Mao, Song Zuo and Vahab Mirrokni, submitted 14 September 2026, reports: "On TCS-Bench, a benchmark of research-level theorem-proving tasks drawn from papers published at FOCS, STOC, and SODA, Colosseum achieves 71.0% accuracy using Gemini 3.1 Pro and Gemini 3.7 Flash."
- The paper reports that in a separate Codeforces evaluation using Gemini 3.1 Pro, "the proof-oriented pipeline with execution feedback solves 218 of 222 problems", and that with Gemini 3.1 Pro the authors "obtain several new results that address open problems arising from papers published at top venues such as FOCS and JMLR".
- The authors state the workflow "has also been integrated into Google Antigravity's Teamwork framework as the Long Proof pattern", so the harness is already shipping inside a Google product.
- The paper is a preprint by authors at the company whose models it evaluates, the abstract does not name the open problems said to be resolved, and the claimed new results have not been independently checked.
Security, misuse & threat intelligence
Memory-poisoning attack persists across sessions, reaching 81.7% cross-session attack success on Claude Code harmfulPreprintSingle source
- arXiv:2609.13889, "When Malicious Instructions Persist: Persistent Memory Poisoning Attack on Harness-Based Agents" by Shuhuai Huang, Jingfeng Zhang and Hong Jia, submitted 12 September 2026 and announced in the arXiv listing of 15 September, reports: "Across all settings, PMPA achieves average Injection Success Rate (ISR) and Cross-session Attack Success Rate (C-ASR) of 73.7%/ 55.5% on OpenClaw and 66.9%/ 81.7% on Claude Code, while preserving benign task performance on both systems."
- The attack "embeds malicious instructions into benign external sources and induces the victim agent to write them into persistent memory without directly accessing to the agent framework", so the instructions survive into later sessions and trigger further actions and data leakage.
- On defence, the authors report that a targeted prompt-level defence "can reduce memory injection in many settings, but provides limited protection once the persistent memory has been poisoned".
- The paper is a preprint and has not been peer reviewed; the results are the authors' own evaluations against OpenClaw and Claude Code, and neither vendor has responded publicly.
AWS Deception Benchmark: 12 models wrongly flag 41% to 99% of safe code as vulnerable mixedCompany claimPreprintSingle source
- Help Net Security reported on 14 September that AWS has released the Deception Benchmark, a public dataset of "14,822 samples across 16 programming languages and more than 70 Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) categories", of which "9,695 are scored. These include 6,988 code-level and 2,707 environment-gated challenges." The deceptive samples place real vulnerability patterns next to controls that stop them being exploited.
- AWS evaluated "12 models from five providers". With direct prompting, Help Net Security reports, models "incorrectly flagged 41% to 99% of safe code".
- Asking the models to prove exploitability "reduced false positives by 17 to 74 percentage points" but pushed false negatives to "7% to 44%". AWS treats false-positive and false-negative rates below 10% as "a minimum bar for production use", and Help Net Security reports "None of the tested configurations met both thresholds."
- This is AWS evaluating models on a benchmark AWS built, and the accompanying whitepaper is not peer reviewed. Help Net Security reports the models struggled most with environment-gated cases such as Kubernetes network policies.
Manhattan DA seizes 12 domains selling AI deepfake pornography of about 1,200 people beneficial
- The Manhattan District Attorney's Office announced on 14 September that it seized 12 domain names, tied to five online vendors and involving approximately 1,200 victims, in what it calls the largest known seizure of AI-generated celebrity deepfake websites to date. The seizures were carried out pursuant to a court order.
- The office says the victims were overwhelmingly women and primarily public-facing individuals, including actors, politicians, athletes, musicians, social justice advocates and social media influencers.
- District Attorney Alvin Bragg is quoted saying "1,200 individuals had their faces and bodies stolen and turned into illegal pornography on 12 different websites – without their knowledge or consent".
- The release does not name the vendors, does not say whether anyone has been charged, and does not specify which statutes were used; it directs the investigation to the office's Cyber Crime Bureau.
CrowdStrike CEO rejects the slowdown case — "The genie's out of the bottle" — as cyber stocks lead the S&P 500 Update
- CrowdStrike chief executive George Kurtz told CNBC's "Mad Money" on Monday: "The genie's out of the bottle. There's plenty of models that are already out there, both frontier as well as open-weight models, that can already be dangerous." He was responding to Dario Amodei's essay calling on frontier labs to slow the pace of model development.
- CNBC reports CrowdStrike surged nearly 14% on Monday to a record-high close above $235 per share and Palo Alto Networks jumped just over 13%, and that both stocks have gained 100% year to date. Benzinga, writing at 9:23 AM ET on 14 September, reported Okta up roughly 4% in the same rotation.
- Kurtz argued the security industry has to work at runtime rather than at the frontier: "We can look at what these programs do. We can put our own guardrails around them at runtime… and we can prevent them from doing bad things." He added "What I do know is that the agents are dangerous" and "You need equivalent or better AI defenses to combat the AI agents."
- Kurtz also cautioned against regulation, saying "If we put too much regulation around this, then it's going to stifle innovation." CNBC published no measurement of AI-related attack volume alongside the interview; the share moves are market reaction, not evidence about model risk.
Military, defense & geopolitics
Pentagon instruction sets rules for AI-generated code: unverified input, human review, no non-public data in outside tools beneficialUpdate
- DefenseScoop reported on 14 September that a 37-page Department of War instruction on accelerated mission software, signed by chief information officer Kirsten Davies on 31 August, took effect on 8 September and governs AI-assisted software development across the department.
- The instruction states that "AI-generated code will be considered unverified input, and its use does not absolve the developer or the government of responsibility for the resulting work product", and requires AI-suggested code to undergo the same review and security testing as manually written code, including checks for vulnerabilities, safety implications, logical errors, intellectual property infringement and licence compliance.
- DefenseScoop reports the instruction bars entering non-public Department of Defense information — code, configuration scripts, infrastructure definitions, schematics or documentation — into unapproved generative AI applications outside the Pentagon's systems, and requires contractual guarantees that government data and user prompts will not be shared or used to train external models.
- The instruction is policy, not measurement: DefenseScoop reports no figures on how much of the department's code is currently AI-generated, and no enforcement mechanism or audit schedule is described.
Air Force secretary: at least 500 Collaborative Combat Aircraft in service by 2032, flying manned-fighter missions
- Air Force Secretary Troy Meink said at AFA's Air, Space & Cyber Conference in National Harbor, Maryland: "We intend to have at least 500 of these in service by 2032, and they'll be performing many of the same missions that we do with manned fighters today." DefenseScoop published the account on 14 September.
- DefenseScoop reports General Atomics' aircraft is designated FQ-42A Vengeance and Anduril's is FQ-44A Fury, that both manufacturers have begun producing Increment 1 aircraft, and that the Air Force requested $996.5 million in fiscal 2027 to start Increment 1 procurement. It puts the cost at roughly $30 million per aircraft, about a third of an F-35.
- Alongside the CCA programme, DefenseScoop reports a Massed Modular Aircraft line targeting 100 platforms by 2029 and 500 in service by 2032, and a Family of Affordable Mass Munitions with nearly 28,000 units planned over five years and production beginning in autumn 2026.
- Neither the mission autonomy software nor the rules of engagement for these aircraft were detailed at the conference, and no test results or autonomy evaluation data were released alongside the numbers.
China's state security minister singles out OpenClaw and calls for special AI laws, The Register reports UpdateSingle source
- The Register reported on 15 September on an article by Chen Yixin, China's minister of state security, in China Cyberspace magazine, in which Chen wrote that "The field of AI has become the main battleground for global technological competition".
- The Register says Chen singled out "OpenClaw and similar products", criticising "structural problems such as remote control of device management permissions and leakage of sensitive user information", and set out risks including weaponisation for vulnerability detection and infrastructure attacks, theft of industrial and state secrets, overseas data leaks, algorithmic opacity amplifying social biases, and attribution problems in automated decision-making.
- Chen's prescribed response, per The Register, is for China to achieve "independent control of key core technologies, firmly grasp technological sovereignty" and to enact "special laws and regulations targeting the research, development, application, and supervision of artificial intelligence technology".
- This adds the product criticism and the call for dedicated AI legislation to Chen's "new arena for strategic rivalry" framing covered in an earlier edition. The Register's account cites no documented attack on Chinese systems and no figures quantifying China's exposure.
China's new exit rules take effect, allowing travel bans on citizens who endanger "technological security" harmful
- China's new Exit and Entry Administration Provisions took effect on Tuesday 15 September 2026. Free Malaysia Today reports the rules target violations of export controls or technology import and export rules that may endanger "industrial or technological security", and were unveiled in July.
- The News International reports the regulations were formulated by the State Council alongside multiple ministries and empower border and security authorities to impose exit bans, and says individuals who breach technology import and export rules — "particularly engineers and corporate officials operating in sensitive sectors like artificial intelligence (AI) and advanced manufacturing" — face immediate travel restrictions.
- Free Malaysia Today reports the rules provide for exit bans of six months to three years on citizens who return to China after committing illegal or criminal acts abroad that harm national security or interests, and that foreign nationals may be denied entry for one to five years for false statements in visa applications.
- Free Malaysia Today reports Taiwan's Mainland Affairs Council deputy head raised concerns about the new "export control" and "technology import-export management" grounds, particularly for Taiwanese tech workers. Neither report cites a case in which the AI-related grounds have been used.
Health, science & medicine
Nature Medicine: fully on-premise clinical agent scores 90.04% on a seven-disease MIMIC-IV benchmark beneficial
- The paper, published in Nature Medicine on 15 September 2026, reports that a fully on-premise clinical agent "achieved 90.04% accuracy on a seven-disease task and 83.8% accuracy on a four-disease task" across two MIMIC-IV-derived benchmarks. On the primary benchmark MIRA-v2, Qwen-3.5 reached 90.0%, GLM-5 89.7%, GLM-4.5-Air 88.4% and GPT-OSS 85.3%, against a cloud baseline of GPT-5.2 at 90.7% — "The best on-premise model was, therefore, within 0.7 percentage points of the cloud baseline."
- On the CDM benchmark (four abdominal categories, n = 2,400) Qwen-3.5 scored 83.8% and GLM-4.5-Air 81.2%; the paper states "The highest previously reported open-weight result on this benchmark was 70.5% (Gemma-3)."
- The authors report that behavioural consistency across repeated runs discriminated correct from incorrect diagnoses better than the model's own probability score (AUC = 0.860 versus 0.747), and that at a consistency threshold of 0.90, "49.4% of cases were retained at 98.9% diagnostic accuracy" — 272 cases routed to autonomous handling, with three errors among them.
- The paper states its own limits plainly: both primary benchmarks derive from MIMIC-IV and "a single-institution data ecology"; the evaluation is text-only; consistency thresholds "must be calibrated to the deployment configuration"; and "all evaluations were retrospective simulations", with prospective studies and bias audits still required.
Audit of 26 language models finds 55.4% of generated biomedical references fabricated harmfulPreprint
- arXiv:2609.14988, "Biomedical Reference Generation Remains Unreliable across 26 Large Language Models", submitted 14 September 2026 by Maxim Topaz and colleagues, prompted "26 language models from eight developers (2023 to 2026) to supply a missing reference for each of 69 biomedical passages across ten domains".
- The paper reports: "Across all models, 55.4% of responses were fabricated and 14.9% were correct in every field." Fabrication "ranged from 10.2% (Claude Opus 4.8, which declined 52.1% of prompts) to 98.4% (Ministral 3B, which produced no verifiable reference)".
- Among models first released in 2026, the paper reports fabricated and all-fields-correct proportions of "35.3% and 31.8%, respectively". GPT-5.5 "was correct in every field in 48.1%", and Claude Opus 4.6 and Claude Sonnet 4.5 produced similar proportions of verifiable references (77.6% and 76.6%) but were correct in every evaluated field in 54.6% and 19.9% of responses.
- The authors conclude that "no model was correct in every evaluated bibliographic field in more than 54.6% of responses" and that "references produced with model assistance require verification before use". The paper is a preprint and has not been peer reviewed.
Documents from EFF FOIA suit show Medicare's AI prior-authorisation pilot launched on untested software harmfulUpdate
- STAT reported on 15 September that the rollout of the Wasteful and Inappropriate Service Reduction model, or WISeR, "was hasty and error-ridden, according to more than a thousand pages of recently released documents and data" obtained by the Electronic Frontier Foundation through a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit against the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.
- STAT reports the pilot launched in January, requires prior approval for certain procedures and products including skin substitutes and epidural injections for pain management, operates in New Jersey, Ohio, Oklahoma, Texas, Arizona and Washington, and will run until 2031. STAT reports the documents show one WISeR vendor warned CMS that it was unrealistic to expect a working product by the launch date the agency wanted.
- The EFF's own analysis of the same records, published 8 September, reports that one prior authorisation request went unanswered for 83 days against a 72-hour standard, that two vendors alone denied over 20,000 requests in the first three months, that Virtix denied more requests than it approved in that period, and that low quality scores reduce vendor payments by only 5–10%. EFF quotes Innovaccer telling CMS about a month before launch that "auto-affirming is the only path available".
- The remainder of the STAT article is paywalled, so the figures in the previous bullet come from the EFF analysis rather than from STAT. CMS has not published a response to the released records.
Policy, regulation & law
Trump calls AI risk a "HOAX", attacks Amodei, and says the only guardrail AI needs is a "STRONG AND SMART" president Update
- NBC News reports Trump "posted in support of AI more than a half-dozen times Monday on Truth Social". CNBC quotes him writing: "I'm right now breaking another Hoax — That AI is going to take over, consume, and destroy the World, and that Robots will be marching into our Cities, and getting rid of us all!" and "There is a SICK conspiracy going on against AI and Data Centers, and the only one that is happy about it is China."
- NBC News quotes him writing that the only control needed is "a STRONG AND SMART (High IQ!) PRESIDENT", and naming "Dario (Anthropic!), who is now pretending to be a 'perfect little angel'". CNBC quotes a further post: "Concerning AI, when, in the History of Business, did anyone see the Leaders of an Industry call for Regulation that, if strongly implemented, will drive them into oblivion and bankruptcy?"
- CNBC reports Trump also wrote "We already have tremendous CRIMINAL and REGULATORY power over these companies!", and that the posts followed Amodei's weekend essay "We Must Pace the Frontier". CNBC reports Anthropic did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Trump's posts.
- CNBC notes any AI regulation by Congress appears unlikely before the 3 November midterms, with House members due to leave Washington on Thursday and stay in their districts through October. No executive action was announced alongside the posts.
Trump phones Jensen Huang live on stage at the All-In Summit; Huang answers "We're not going to let that happen, sir" Update
- TechCrunch, publishing on 14 September at 2:51 PM PDT, reports that Trump called Nvidia chief executive Jensen Huang while Huang was on stage at the All-In Summit in Los Angeles on Monday morning, and that Huang put the president on speakerphone for the audience. The panel had been discussing Dario Amodei's call to slow the pace of capability gains.
- TechCrunch quotes Trump saying "We're not going to let that happen. It's a hoax", and Huang replying "You're right. We're not going to let that happen, sir."
- NBC News, publishing at 7:06 PM EDT on 14 September, quotes Trump on the call: "The robots will not be taking over. The AI will not be taking over the rest of the world", "The whole thing is a hoax" and "Data centers are great, and they make people wealthy". NBC quotes Huang saying "We're going to make sure that everybody wins in the AI race in America."
- Neither report carries a White House readout or an Nvidia statement beyond what was said on stage. TechCrunch separately noted Nvidia's stock is up 33% over the past year but fell a few percentage points on the day.
Obama calls the frontier labs' agreement to slow down "a good and necessary first step"
- Obama wrote on X: "I was encouraged this week to see the leaders of the frontier labs agree on the need for them to slow down the pace of AI development. Given the stakes, it's a good and necessary first step." Benzinga, publishing on 15 September at 12:33 AM, reports he posted on Monday.
- In the same post he wrote that the potential impact of the technology "is not overhyped", that it is "moving at lightning speed – and even faster than those who are engineering it can keep up with", and that he is neither "an AI accelerationist who believes it will lead to some techno-utopia" nor "a doomer who thinks it will inevitably lead to humanity's destruction".
- He wrote that whether the technology produces "amazing breakthroughs in medicine, energy and education" or "huge economic disruptions, greater inequality, and potential catastrophe" will depend on "choices that should be made not just by the companies involved, but by all of us".
- The post is a statement of position, not a policy proposal: it names no bill, agency or threshold. It landed the same day as Trump's posts calling the same concerns a hoax.
Leaked EU Kids Act draft would bar under-15s from social media without parental consent and set rules for AI chatbots mixedSingle source
- Euronews, publishing on 15 September at 8:36 GMT+2, reports that a confidential European Commission document it obtained would bar minors under 15 from creating accounts on social media and video-sharing platforms without parental approval, alongside safety-by-design rules for risky online services.
- Euronews reports the draft covers social media, video-sharing platforms and online games "considered to pose 'specific design risks for minors', as well as AI-powered chatbots and companions, described as 'virtual tools that can give mental health and personal development advice to minors'". The document says these services get "tailored commitments… offering a co-regulatory approach based on industry-led self-regulation".
- The age tiers as reported: children under three barred entirely from social media and other high-risk services; from three to 13, access to child-friendly services under adult supervision; 13 to 15, restricted access with limited features under parental control; and safety-by-design rules still applying to 15- to 18-year-olds, who could access platforms without parental consent. Companies would have to verify age at account creation using an EU-wide app or national solutions.
- The text is a draft, not law. Euronews reports Commission President Ursula von der Leyen is expected to preview it in her State of the Union address and that the bill is due to be published on Thursday; it would then need agreement from member states and the European Parliament.
Senator Kennedy to offer an AI "kill switch" measure Wednesday as Thune and Klobuchar discuss a path forward Single source
- The Associated Press, in a story published 15 September at 12:01 AM, reports Senator John Kennedy (R-La.) plans to offer a "kill switch" measure on Wednesday requiring developers to have the capacity to shut down their systems if needed, and that it would need the Senate's full support to advance.
- AP reports Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) spoke with Senator Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) about a "path forward" on legislation they are working on, and quotes Thune: "You don't want to stifle innovation, but I think you also want to make sure that the more advanced threats can be mitigated and there's a capability and place to do that."
- AP quotes House Speaker Mike Johnson saying "The reflex of legislative bodies is to cover things up with red tape and hyper regulation", and reports House Democrats met privately on Tuesday, that Senator Bernie Sanders is hosting a colleagues' briefing with experts on Wednesday, and that a Washington AI conference on Tuesday features Sanders and Steve Bannon.
- AP notes the House is set to adjourn at the end of the week before the elections, and that a 2024 bipartisan Senate AI working group report recommending at least $32 billion of spending over three years saw little follow-up.
Compute, chips & infrastructure
MediaTek launches the Dimensity 9600 Pro, its first phone chip on TSMC's 2nm node, running 30B models on device Company claim
- MediaTek announced the Dimensity 9600 Pro on 15 September, built on a 2nm process node with a 2+3+3 all-big-core CPU: two C2-Ultra cores at 4.55GHz and six C2-Pro cores at 4.35GHz and 3.1GHz. MediaTek says it delivers "up to 17% higher single-core performance and up to 15% higher multi-core performance" versus the previous generation, with a "61% reduction in multi-core power consumption".
- On AI, MediaTek says a second-generation Super Efficient NPU cuts power consumption by 40% for always-on AI, and that the NPU 1090 delivers "51% higher LLM prefill performance, 55% higher Token generation per watt", with support for models up to 30B parameters running on the handset.
- MediaTek says the G2-Ultra NX GPU gives "up to 27% higher peak performance, 24% lower power consumption at peak performance, and 18% faster raytracing", and that first devices are expected to launch in Q3 2026.
- Every figure here is MediaTek's own and comes from its release; there are no independent benchmarks yet, and the company did not name the first handset makers to ship the chip.
Dutch inference-chip startup Euclyd raises over €200 million in a Series A co-led by Samsung Company claim
- Euclyd announced on 15 September that it raised over €200 million in a Series A co-led by Samsung, Somerset Capital Partners, the EQT-managed Scaleup Europe Fund and Innovation Industries, with EIFO, imec.xpand, the Brabant Development Agency and Quadri also participating. Peter Wennink, former president and chief executive of ASML, joins as chairman.
- CNBC reports the same round as "$231 million" and says chief executive Bernardo Kastrup told it the Eindhoven company is designing an inference system with an architecture different from GPUs, covering both processor and memory. CNBC notes: "Euclyd's systems have yet to be proven at scale in commercial deployments."
- Kastrup told CNBC the company aims to begin rolling out physical chip systems in 2028, with thousands of enterprise customers served by 2030, and said of Samsung: "They are one of the biggest memory manufacturers in the world… they know the supply chain, they have a huge network."
- Euclyd's release names its products as "craftwerk" agentic AI silicon and a "craftwerk station CWS" low-power exascale AI factory, but discloses no performance figures, no benchmark comparison against Nvidia parts and no deployment dates.
SemiAnalysis measures Vera Rubin NVL72 at up to 7x Blackwell's token throughput per megawatt Company claimSingle source
- SemiAnalysis, publishing on 14 September, writes: "At GTC 2026, Jensen presented this graph that VR NVL72 achieved 3x performance per MW compared to Blackwell on O(1-3 Trillion) parameter model around 200 TPS. But when compared to the real world performance of Rubin already on prelease software, we are already seeing up to 7x better token throughput per megawatt."
- It reports that in the realistic 60–100 tokens-per-second operating range, "Vera Rubin achieves between 1.4x and 3x the throughput per TCO compared to the latest and greatest GB300 TRTLLM configuration", and that "Vera Rubin achieves approximately 61% higher maximum P90 interactivity than GB300 Dynamo TRTLLM, reaching 276.24 versus 171.53 P90 TPS". It adds that with the open-source SGLang stack, "GB300 can achieve similar interactivity as Vera Rubin".
- SemiAnalysis models "$159.5 billion in annual revenue and $149.9 billion in modeled profit per all-in utility GW" at 75 TPS and 60% utilisation, about "39% more revenue and 42% more modeled profit" than GB300 Dynamo SGLang, and says the rack tested is "the production SKU of 2300W TDP & 1.5TB of CPU LPDDR5X per compute tray".
- The measurements are on pre-release software, and SemiAnalysis thanks "Jensen Huang, Ian Buck, Nick Comly, Kedar Potdar, Rohit Nagraj, and the Mainland China TensorRTLLM Team" for help with the software bring-up and for verifying the benchmark results, so this is not an arm's-length test.
Broadcom's Hock Tan stands by a $115 billion fiscal 2027 AI chip target as the stock falls 4.8% Company claimUpdate
- Asked on CNBC's "Mad Money" on Monday whether the AI slowdown debate had caused him to reconsider Broadcom's fiscal 2027 and 2028 AI semiconductor forecasts, chief executive Hock Tan said: "No, not in the least." On the 2 September earnings call he had forecast AI semiconductor revenue of $115 billion in fiscal 2027, doubling to $230 billion in fiscal 2028.
- CNBC reports Broadcom shares fell 4.8% on Monday and the iShares Semiconductor ETF fell 5.6%, as investors reconsidered compute demand after Amodei's essay. Tan said Anthropic is on track to become Broadcom's largest custom chip customer in 2027 and to hold that position in 2028, displacing Google.
- Tan said he agrees with Amodei about the need for some restrictions — "Like any tool, it's important to put governances, safeguards on how we use the tool" — but added of AI that "It's not a live animal that will run wild by itself."
- The $115 billion and $230 billion figures are company guidance, not booked revenue, and Broadcom has not disclosed the contracted volumes behind them.
Deployment & impact
404 Media: hundreds of OpenAI contractors read real ChatGPT conversations under an effort called Project Lily harmfulSingle source
- 404 Media reported on 14 September that "OpenAI is hiring hundreds of contractors who read a massive stream of real users' ChatGPT prompts, with the prompts sometimes including sensitive personal information", and that what reviewers see "can include whole conversations between users and the chatbot, conversations that most of ChatGPT's more than 900 million users probably don't realize may be read by actual people".
- 404 Media reports the reviewers rate and critique the chatbot's replies, and that internal documents it saw show contractors training ChatGPT "to not anthropomorphize itself, and to be less sycophantic".
- On privacy, 404 Media reports the contractors do not see ChatGPT usernames and that OpenAI says it tries to remove personal information before prompts reach reviewers, but "the company acknowledged sensitive details can still get through". Anthropic confirmed to 404 Media that it also uses human review to improve its models.
- 404 Media quotes someone who works with the prompts, asked whether users know humans read their chats: "No. I don't think they would imagine some contractor somewhere [...] is analyzing the conversations." The report is 404 Media's alone and OpenAI has published no response.
Nvidia and other large customers curb Anthropic model use over data-retention terms, The Information reports mixedSingle source
- Quartz, writing on 14 September and citing The Information's reporting, says Palantir, Nvidia and Booz Allen Hamilton are restricting or threatening to drop advanced models from Anthropic and OpenAI unless the labs provide stronger data protections: Palantir has pressed Anthropic for guarantees of zero data retention, Nvidia restricts Anthropic's models to less sensitive internal tasks in favour of its own Nemotron models, and Booz Allen has forbidden staff from running Anthropic's commercial model on cybersecurity projects that touch proprietary data.
- Quartz traces the dispute to a 30-day data retention policy Anthropic introduced in June with the rollout of Fable 5, which the company said it needed "to detect sophisticated attacks that unfold across multiple sessions" and would not use for training.
- Tom's Hardware, relaying the same report, says a large US utility company cancelled plans to test Fable — it had wanted to know whether the model could run core power infrastructure — after Anthropic refused a nonrevocable zero data retention policy, that Northrop Grumman runs open-source models on its own air-gapped servers instead, and that Novo Nordisk uses Claude but bans proprietary data from it.
- Quartz reports Anthropic's answer is Enterprise Frontier Safeguards, which lets enterprise customers keep activity data in their own Amazon S3, Azure Blob Storage or Google Cloud Storage under their own keys, with automated monitoring and no human review by Anthropic staff, rolling out in phases with broader availability targeted for later this autumn. The originating report is The Information's, which we could not open.
Epoch AI and Ipsos: share of US adults using AI 6–7 days a week rose from 8.2% to 18.7% between March and August Single source
- Epoch AI, publishing on 14 September, reports that the share of US adults who used AI on 6–7 days in the previous week rose from 8.2% in March 2026 (90% CI 7.2–9.3) to 18.7% in August 2026 (90% CI 16.7–20.8). Any weekly AI use rose from 50.0% to 56.4%, and the share using AI on just one day fell from 17.3% to 10.1%.
- The figures come from two Epoch AI/Ipsos surveys of US adults on Ipsos' KnowledgePanel, fielded 3–5 March 2026 (n=2,017, 1,028 AI users) and 28–30 August 2026 (n=1,016, 574 AI users), weighted to represent US adults aged 18 and over.
- Epoch flags its own comparability problem: "The days of use question changed between waves, in two ways." March asked one overall question with three bands; August asked per-service day counts from 1 to 7 and Epoch took the maximum across services, which it says "may understate frequency relative to an overall-use question". Epoch concludes "comparisons of frequency across the two waves are approximate".
- The two waves are separate samples rather than the same people tracked over time, so the result is a population-level shift, not a measurement of individuals changing their behaviour.
Oracle cut staff again on Monday, weeks after adding $700 million to its 2026 restructuring plan harmfulSingle source
- The Register, publishing on 14 September at 21:46 UTC, reports that employees discovered the latest round of Oracle layoffs on Monday when they lost access to corporate systems such as email and Slack, because notifications were not consistently sent to personal addresses. Those who reached their accounts saw: "After careful consideration of Oracle's current business needs, we have made the decision to eliminate your role as part of a broader organizational change."
- The Register reports severance of four weeks of pay plus one additional week per year of employment, and says some of those cut had more than 20 years' tenure. Oracle declined to comment on the layoffs.
- The cuts follow a filing in which Oracle added roughly $700 million to its 2026 restructuring plan, taking total estimated restructuring costs to about $2.8 billion. The Register reports first-quarter fiscal 2027 revenue of $19.3 billion and net income of $4.76 billion, with about 30% year-over-year growth.
- Oracle has not said how many people were cut in this round, or which teams and regions were affected, so the scale is not established.